Targeting properties that no longer fulfill a vital government function, the General Services Administration (GSA) has prioritized streamlining the federal real estate portfolio in recent years. An ambitious step toward more effective government operations and a sustainable fiscal future is the GSA non-core property list. These properties, which have been deemed obsolete or non-essential, are ready for sale or other uses, offering a chance to cut expenses while releasing potential benefits for nearby communities.
The GSA initiative is a deliberate process aimed at creating room for more vital government assets, not just clearing space. In addition to helping taxpayers, the sale or repurposing of non-core properties will allow the government to reinvest the proceeds back into mission-critical areas such as law enforcement, national defense, and essential services as it attempts to reduce wasteful spending. With increasing pressure to update aging infrastructure, government agencies are becoming more resource-conscious, as evidenced by the GSA’s non-core property list.
Key Non-Core Properties on the GSA List
The GSA’s non-core property list is diverse, encompassing various types of facilities across the nation. From large office buildings to smaller courthouses, the properties on this list represent an eclectic mix of real estate. These are some of the notable properties being considered for disposal:
| Property Name | City | State | Square Footage | Type of Property |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilbur J. Cohen Building | Washington | DC | 1,045,197 | Office |
| California St Federal Garage | Denver | CO | 1,646 | Parking Structure |
| Federal Building and US Courthouse | Los Angeles | CA | 751,791 | Office |
| Richard B. Anderson Federal Building | Port Angeles | WA | 19,193 | Office |
| James A. Redden U.S. Courthouse | Medford | OR | 29,834 | Courthouse |
| Jeffersonville Federal Center | Jeffersonville | IN | 1,094,517 | Office, Warehouse |
| Robert C. Weaver Building | Washington | DC | 1,121,915 | Office |
| Federal Building, 7th & D | Washington | DC | 845,169 | Office |
The GSA Non-Core Property List’s Significance
Future directions for federal real estate management are outlined in the GSA’s non-core property list. Once necessary, these properties are now a burden on the public coffers. The federal government can no longer afford to continue using buildings that are out-of-date and underutilized, especially since many of them are over 50 years old and there is a massive maintenance backlog. The goal of GSA’s decision to sell or repurpose non-core properties is to lower the operating expenses of federal agencies.
More than 440 properties, ranging from government office buildings to service facilities that are no longer in use, were identified by the GSA as non-core properties in 2025. The GSA seeks to maximize the federal real estate portfolio by disposing of these properties in a way that maximizes value for taxpayers and unlocks potential value for private investors and local communities. This ruling is a component of a larger initiative to ensure that core assets, including courthouses and federal offices that are essential to national security, continue to be prioritized and to right-size federal real estate.
Impact on Finance and Operations: How Taxpayers Gain
The GSA anticipates reducing operating expenses by up to $430 million a year through the sale of non-core properties—a remarkably large sum that could be used to fund more vital federal initiatives. To update the properties to modern standards, more than $8 billion would be needed, many of which are vacant or no longer functional. Considering these numbers, it appears that the choice to sell the properties will significantly reduce the financial burden on public coffers.
Buildings like the Social Security Administration annex and FBI headquarters, for instance, are no longer regarded as necessary in their current configuration. Despite their historical significance, these areas are expensive liabilities that the federal workforce will not likely use in the future. The public sector will benefit financially from the sale of these non-core assets, which will lower taxpayer costs and free up infrastructure and valuable land for new private sector initiatives.
Using the GSA Non-Core Property List to Simplify Government Operations
Another important aspect of simplifying government operations is the GSA’s objective of selling off non-core properties. The government can concentrate on increasing the effectiveness of its agencies by taking up less space. The need for updated office space is critical as government buildings age and lose their functionality. The GSA is clearing the path for improved resource allocation by selling these non-core assets, freeing up federal resources to concentrate on its core functions, including emergency response, law enforcement, and defense.
Additionally, the GSA’s decision to sell these properties presents a special chance for local governments and private investors to intervene. These structures can be converted into a range of new uses, such as commercial offices or affordable housing, which will boost the local economy in the communities where they are situated.
The Future of GSA’s Non-Core Property Strategy: What Comes Next?
As the agency seeks to identify and get rid of properties that no longer support the government’s mission, the non-core property list will keep changing. The GSA will seek to expedite the sale or redevelopment of these properties in the upcoming years, creating new opportunities for local governments, developers, and private investors.
In addition to being economically advantageous, this action supports a larger federal objective of increasing operational sustainability and efficiency. The GSA is guaranteeing a more resource-efficient government and laying the groundwork for long-term success by selling off non-core properties and concentrating on the vital infrastructure needed for federal operations.
In the end, the GSA’s rightsizing strategy for federal real estate is a progressive move that tackles historical inefficiencies and creates room for a more modern and flexible federal infrastructure. With creative ideas for repurposing these buildings changing the face of American cities, the real estate market is expected to see a surge in activity as new details become available.
